|
|
POST-PORN-MODERNISM
IN THE NOUGHTIES
Hardcore from the Heart. The Pleasures, Profits and Politics
of Sex in
Performance: Annie Sprinkle SOLO. Edited with commentaries
by Gabrielle Cody.
London and New York: Continuum Academic, 2001. Whaddya
Mean You're Allergic to Rubber? By Rachel Berger. Ringwood,
Victoria: Penguin, 2001.
Reviewed by Evelyn Hartogh |
 |
Hardcore from the Heart is a selection of post-porn-modernist
Annie Sprinkle's performance scripts and articles, transcripts
of conversations about Annie Sprinkle by renowned performance
artists such as Veronica Vera and Linda Montano, and essays
by Gabrielle Cody. The book is kissed by academic and performative
credibility with a forward by Rebecca Schneider, author of
the feminist performance artist's bible, The Explicit Body
in Performance (Routledge 1997).
Hardcore is an excellent collection mainly due to the
wide diversity of forms (scripts, articles, essays, conversations)
and viewpoints in relation to Annie. The most exciting of
these was the transcript of 'Annie's Dessert with Mae Tyme,
an Anti Porn Feminist.' It is a most amicable and informative
discussion and the women acknowledge this at the end, Annie
confesses her longtime but thwarted desire to have such a
conversation: 'Everyone I've ever met who is anti-porn would
never sit down at a table with me', while Mae admits to never
desiring such a conversation but concedes: 'I'm glad to be
having it with you'. Mae winds up the discussion by saying:
A
conversation like this is possible when each of us has
freedom of expression and no-one is required to change.
I don't expect you to become anti-porn, and you don't
expect me to become pro-porn.
|
Annie Sprinkle came across to me as a thoroughly warm, compassionate
and honest woman. She is in many ways the ultimate 'Hooker
with a Heart of Gold', while at the same time possessing the
kind of passion for contemplation that makes her a true philosopher.
Philosophy is after all the love (philos) of wisdom (sophia),
and Annie is a figure who has sought knowledge, experience,
debate and discovery all her life.
Sprinkle is most famous for her performance of displaying
her cervix to audiences. This inside/out display of the ultimate
hidden reaches of woman acts as a physical manifestation of
the philosophies of Cixous and Irigaray. Annie's credibility
in resituating porn in art, and celebrating female sexuality,
lies in her 'herstory' of being a sex worker and porn star.
She (literally) knows the industry inside and out and, although
her work seeks to disrupt sexual repression and negative attitudes
towards sex, she is not above critiquing her past. In an open
letter to a New York performance space Annie says: 'I was
sometimes quite naive, very immature, and in denial about
a lot of things.... How precious to have a place which is
so sex positive that we can be "negative." Please
continue to maintain a good balance.' I wonder if it can really
be said that Annie made a 'transition' from prostitution and
pornography to performance art and academia (she's currently
completing her PhD). Wasn't she always a performance artist?
And does she still remain a prostitute? Jill Dolan in her
1989 article 'Desire Cloaked in a Trenchcoat' (Acting Out:
Feminist Performances, University of Michigan Press, 1993),
suggests that the 'positions of female performer and female
spectator are collapsed into one; they become prostitutes
who buy and sell their own image in a male-generated visual
economy.'
It is after all the 'oldest profession' and in the last decade
many books discussing the politics of sex work have invariably
brought up the image of the ancient temple prostitute. While
the existence of a golden age of matriarchy is debatable,
the image is strong enough regardless to still affect this
age. The by-gone era of the sacred prostitute is also described
as a time where female sexuality was worshipped and every
woman was treated like a goddess. Vestiges of the goddess-whore
remain in the sophisticated Geisha, legends of Concubines
with political influence, the high-class Ancient Athenian
hetaerae, and more recently in the untouchable (yet deeply
intimate) worship of celebrity through mass media.
Gabrielle Cody points out that pornography as a separate category
did not appear until the nineteenth century, 'when lawmakers
throughout Europe ostensibly sought to protect a predominantly
white, middle-class female population from sexually explicit
material and - by extension - knowledge of their own sexuality'.
Suppression of pornography and the coding of it as a 'dirty'
and 'unladylike' commodity does not diminish its audience,
which is primarily men. Male sexuality is thus in many ways
hidden from view, and it is male desire which is hidden, in
the beats to which married men sneak of, in the darkened XXXX
movie theatres, in the secret visits to prostitutes, in the
Playboys hidden in the shed. Is this a masculine embarrassment
or a fear of sexuality?
Although men are predominantly the consumers of porn, and
the customers of sex workers, it has been the women on display,
or for rent, who have borne the brunt of the coding of 'dirty'
and 'unladylike'. Women's expression of their sexuality has
mainly been in response to male desire, yet in recent decades
feminists have consistently challenged this. Annie Sprinkle
is at the forefront of the redefinition of female sexuality.
| There
is a war going on in people's bedrooms, people are ignorant,
fearful and confused about sex, unsatisfied, lying to
their spouses, there is rape, abuse, unwanted pregnancy,
too much sexually transmitted disease ... we must have
better sex education. (Annie Sprinkle's 'Peace in Bed')
|
What better way to educate people about safe sex, and about
the lives of HIV positive people, than to do it with humour.
Rachel Berger's first novel Whaddya Mean You're Allergic
to Rubber? zooms from Leather Bars to formal political
dinners, to the AIDS Council, and to well-known cafes and
bars in Melbourne. Berger is one of Australia's most successful
stand up comediennes and, in the transition from stage to
page, she worked on some innovative graphic design with her
editor as 'a little treat for the reader', as she told Queensland
Pride. Berger explained that in the situation of live
performance 'I have my whole body and face to use.'
Berger's main character is Lola Finklestein, a feisty comedienne
who, in the tradition of Scooby Doo, accidentally falls into
the role of detective. Lola's Scooby-gang is made up of Drag
Queens, Leather Queens, HIV positive characters, AIDS Council
workers, and public servants spilling the goods on corrupt
politicians. Lola and her friends are trying to find out why
Springfield Hospital, which predominantly treats HIV positive
patients, is being closed down. The answer is an ugly combination
of economic rationalism and homophobia since, it emerges,
the hospital building is being sold for an American private
prison.
Berger avoided writing any physical descriptions of Lola and
described her as a character that lives through her head.
'What was potent was what was coming of out of her mouth ...
Lola does not rely on her physicality at all and we have had
two decades of women being objectified and even now they are
still being objectified but it's a little more sophisticated.'
The novel also works not only to promote the importance and
ease of safe sex but to also dispel myths about the lived
experiences of HIV positive people. 'All the positive characters
in the book are not victims. Smoky Topaz is potent, and Christopher
Pillar is potent, and Dierdre is potent. They are all really
potent, none of them are victims because anybody that I know
that is positive - it is about reasonable adjustment', Berger
explained. Dierdre is a heterosexual woman who, while she
was married, was informed by her doctor that she was both
pregnant and HIV positive. 'The three characters in the book
who are positive are not gay - I didn't want to buy into those
stereotypes.... I'm hoping the mainstream audience will understand
that it [safe sex, HIV and AIDS] is not just relevant to the
gay community.'
Rachel Berger is primarily a comedian so, although this book
is extremely topical and blatantly realistic in its critique
of government policy and public opinion, it still is a very
funny book. The characters are dynamic and believable, and
the humour ranges from dry to banana-split-like slapstick.
Lola is a bit of a haphazard creature but is extremely likeable
- she is courageous and naive at the same time, which distances
the character from the super-perfect protagonists of most
detective fiction. This novel crosses many genres, not only
Detective Fiction but also Comedy, Political Satire, Farce,
Romance and Queer Fiction. My only criticism of it is that
perhaps some of the dialogue is overly wordy and repetitive
- but the reader always has the options of skimming over conversations
that reiterate information already presented. On the whole,
I'm very impressed with Berger's debut novel.
Evelyn Hartogh has a Masters in Women's Studies from Griffith
University (1997) and recently completed and submitted her
Masters in Creative Writing to the University of Queensland.
She writes a fortnightly column for Queensland Pride Magazine
entitled 'Evelyn Hartogh's Pop Cult Sheroes' which discusses
historical and fictional representations of women. |
|
|