|
ENGL2035:
Modernism |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Select one of the texts on the course (or, in the case of the poetry, a set of texts), and write a critical essay of 2000 words on one of the supplied topics on that text. This is a research essay. In it you are expected to show that you have read and can make use of some of the scholarly criticism relevant to your topic. As the criteria sheet shows, this is a prime criterion: an essay which does not do this will not qualify for a pass, no matter how excellent it may be in other respects. The essay should not just repeat the work we have done in class, or the views in the introduction or the critical apparatus of the editions we have been using. It should be your own carefully developed critical argument, drawing on relevant scholarly criticism, and documenting meticulously all such uses. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Your choice of topic for the essay determines which of three groups you are assigned to, and consequently the date on which your essay is due.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Before you begin your essay Make sure you have read and understand:
The criteria You should pay careful attention to the criteria sheet, and the qualities against which your essay will be graded. In particular, note the two prime criteria:
Research How much extra material should you read for this essay? There's no single right answer to that, but do keep in mind that I'm not looking for a large bibliography, I'm looking for the ways in which you can use your further reading in the text of the essay--the ways in which it actively contributes to an argument which develops that reading and its ideas. Here again, you should see the Guide to Critical Reading. In general, I nearly always find that a small bibliography in which all of the entries are well used in the essay is far more impressive than a big bibliography appended to an essay which makes only passing use of the items it mentions. Essay key Do read the Essay Key carefully before you write this essay, for the simple reason that there's a very good chance it will save you marks. It's a compilation of all sorts of things I've commented on in assignments over a number of years. I've put them all together in the one place so that (a) rather than penalize people for them after the event, I can give out the Key before the event, so you need never make those particular mistakes; and (b) if those mistakes do come up in your work, I can refer you to the Key, where you'll often find a more detailed explanation than I can afford to give in the margins of an individual essay. Make use of it! |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bonuses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
At the bottom of the criteria sheet for this assignment, you will notice an area for bonuses. I've kept a record of the feedback I gave you on your first essay, and in particular of those aspects which might have effectively lost you marks: problems with expression, difficulties in structuring an argument, and so on. The Bonus section is a chance to regain some of these marks. You can regain up to 4 percentage points for this assignment for making clear improvements in any of the four principal categories on the short assignment's criteria sheet: Principal Texts, Analysis, Argument, and Style and Expression. Half points can also be given, in recognition that even if a problem's not entirely fixed, you've taken significant steps in addressing it. Note, though, that negative points can also be given. If you haven't made any attempt at addressing things which were pointed out in the feedback on the previous essay, you may lose marks. The onus is on you. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The aims of this assignment are:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Graduate Attributes this assignment fosters are:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||