Department of
Speech Pathology & Audiology
The University
of Queensland
Well-formedness judgement in Broca’s aphasia:
Comparing offline and online performance.
Judgments of sentence well-formedness have played an
important role in attempts to understand the processing impairments
underlying the agrammatic comprehension deficit. A strong claim has been
made in the literature on the basis of well-formedness data, i.e., that
parsing operations are essentially intact in Broca’s aphasia. An offline
well-formedness judgment task and its online counterpart were conducted
with six Broca’s aphasics and six neurologically-intact adults. The
error-types of interest were semantic errors, inflectional (agreement)
errors, and thematic-role reversal errors.
Whilst retaining above-chance sensitivity to well-formedness violations, the Broca’s aphasics’ results were
significantly poorer than the control group across both the offline and
online paradigms. The online results reflected the general pattern from
the offline testing, but with a greater proportion of errors. Across both
tasks, inflectional errors proved to be the most difficult error-type to
detect for the Broca’s aphasics. Thematic–role reversal errors were also
compromised, especially in more complex sentence-types. Semantic
violations were generally easily detected.
The results will be discussed in relation to three
prominent theoretical orientations in the agrammatic comprehension
literature, namely, the Trace-Deletion Hypothesis (Grodzinsky, 1995,
2000), the Mapping Hypothesis (Linebarger, Schwartz, & Saffran, 1983),
and processing limitation accounts that subscribe to activation and/or
timing deficit principles. The claim that parsing processes are generally
well-preserved in Broca’s aphasia will also be discussed.
References
Grodzinsky, Y. (1995). A
restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and
Language, 50,
27-51.
Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The
neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area.
Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 23, 1-71.
Linebarger, M.C., Schwartz,
M.F., & Saffran, E.M. (1983). Sensitivity to grammatical
structure in so-called
agrammatic aphasics. Cognition, 13, 361-392.